Firstly, the British education system is completely different of the french one and a little more complicated. To begin with, the british education system guarantees education until 16 or 18. It's since 5 years ago that school is compulsory, children have too wait for secondary school to learn mains subjetcs. Then, the pupils can go to a first system, followed by a large majority of pupils in the public system. It's free and without selection ( 90% of pupils in non state-run selective schools) but there are 20% of pupils who are really good students and have very good results. Otherwise, there is a second system, it is a private school. Parents have to pay so that their children frequent this schools. This are schools to set aside at the richest and for brighter pupils. Nevertheless, 50% obtain notable marks, what is 30% more than the other school. More the A level is naised, more the student increases their chances make up one's mind to attend the university of it's choice because the top universities require excellent A level results. England considers them as prestigious university, considered in the world like oxford, harvad. We can notice that only 5% of pupils from poor neighborhoods make it to these 20 top universities. After their A level, students either the universities or work. Finally I find dammage that it's the rich population wjich access best schools. There is a disparity in the system education, for example, less poor students at britains's top 20 universities. ALThough, the system education is very good (lot of university consider). I think that other country has took example on British education.
