FRstudy.me: votre ressource incontournable pour des réponses expertes. Rejoignez notre communauté de connaisseurs pour accéder à des réponses complètes et fiables sur n'importe quel sujet.
Sagot :
I’m going to talk about the notion: myths and heroes. To begin with, I'd like to give the definition of this notion: A myth can be defined as a story about gods or heroes, it can be a popular belief or a tradition or a false notion. A hero can be a mythological figure, a person who is admired for his or her achievements, a superhero or maybe a role model or an icon. The subject of my presentation will be Charlie Chaplin and the play Macbeth. The goal of my presentation will be to show various types heroes.
Firstly, I will speak about Charlie Chaplin who is a very good example in illustrating who a hero is. Indeed Charlie Chaplin is for me a hero (Charlie Chaplin, to me, is a hero...or as for/as far as am concerned me I consider him a hero). Through these movies he denounced the faults of the American society. It was worth to him the lightnings of the American government and of a part of the American society (revise this sentence to bring out a clear meaning). He showed a ('a' here would indicate quantifying rather than giving the quality) big courage. Indeed, (space after comma) he was ready to face condemnation (use of preferred means that he liked it) or to be disowned by his public rather than to deny these ideas. His heroic acts earned him banishment from the United States in 1952.
However, if the word hero is generally linked to the sense of virtuous, valorous, There (word after a comma begins with a small letter)is not (only) a single kind of hero (if being a hero was only linked to the sense of valor or virtuousness, then there would be no one who could attain the tag hero.)
Indeed, the hero in myths can has fundamentally different characteristics from the conventional heroes. To illustrate this idea I am going to use the tragedy Macbeth by Shakespeare. In this tragedy, the central figure Macbeth is obsessed by the prediction of three witches who persuaded him that he would become the king of Scotland. His wife, lady Macbeth, ambitious and cruel, does not hesitate to push her husband to the murder. The hero here is then the extreme opposite of the common sense of a hero and is no longer representative of virtue but of vice (use of the denotes that you are speaking about a specific trait), is no longer synonymous of admiration but of hatred or sometimes of pity (for example : lady McBeth becomes the victim when she is condemned by her consciousness which makes her crazy and causes her end).
To conclude: (use comma) If the hero was previously an exemplary character, admired by all, some work changed his sense into a detestable character or despicable and thus showed human decadence and serve as moral (when using vocabularies make sure the resulting sentence makes sense).
Firstly, I will speak about Charlie Chaplin who is a very good example in illustrating who a hero is. Indeed Charlie Chaplin is for me a hero (Charlie Chaplin, to me, is a hero...or as for/as far as am concerned me I consider him a hero). Through these movies he denounced the faults of the American society. It was worth to him the lightnings of the American government and of a part of the American society (revise this sentence to bring out a clear meaning). He showed a ('a' here would indicate quantifying rather than giving the quality) big courage. Indeed, (space after comma) he was ready to face condemnation (use of preferred means that he liked it) or to be disowned by his public rather than to deny these ideas. His heroic acts earned him banishment from the United States in 1952.
However, if the word hero is generally linked to the sense of virtuous, valorous, There (word after a comma begins with a small letter)is not (only) a single kind of hero (if being a hero was only linked to the sense of valor or virtuousness, then there would be no one who could attain the tag hero.)
Indeed, the hero in myths can has fundamentally different characteristics from the conventional heroes. To illustrate this idea I am going to use the tragedy Macbeth by Shakespeare. In this tragedy, the central figure Macbeth is obsessed by the prediction of three witches who persuaded him that he would become the king of Scotland. His wife, lady Macbeth, ambitious and cruel, does not hesitate to push her husband to the murder. The hero here is then the extreme opposite of the common sense of a hero and is no longer representative of virtue but of vice (use of the denotes that you are speaking about a specific trait), is no longer synonymous of admiration but of hatred or sometimes of pity (for example : lady McBeth becomes the victim when she is condemned by her consciousness which makes her crazy and causes her end).
To conclude: (use comma) If the hero was previously an exemplary character, admired by all, some work changed his sense into a detestable character or despicable and thus showed human decadence and serve as moral (when using vocabularies make sure the resulting sentence makes sense).
Nous apprécions votre participation active dans ce forum. Continuez à explorer, poser des questions et partager vos connaissances avec la communauté. Ensemble, nous trouvons les meilleures solutions. Chaque question trouve sa réponse sur FRstudy.me. Merci et à très bientôt pour d'autres solutions.
